For the first time in more than a decade a significant piece
of forest legislation has been enacted that enjoys both industry and
environmental community support. This thanks to Governor Brown signing AB
1492 today in Sacramento. The legislation provides critical relief for all
private landowners from excessive liability claims made by the federal
government for wildfires. The legislation is a package deal,
forged through a collaborative process with compromise from all parties –
environmentalists as well as timber industry interest. It is has been controversial
because it makes significant reforms to fire liability provision in current
law, changes to timber harvest plan (THP) regulations and includes a stable
funding source to pay for the regulatory structure. The funding source is a 1%
levy on timber products sold in California estimated to raise up to $30 million
annually (50 cents on the average lumber ticket at a big box retailer in the
state, and less than $150 on a new $300,000 house).
This reform package has been desperately needed. California
is subject to substantial forest fire threat and when public lands are damaged
through negligence occurring on private lands, the damage liability under
current law is eight to ten times the actual commercial value of the property.
No other state in the country has such a fire liability scheme. The result of this is that California timber
operators are facing a terribly difficult time getting liability insurance, and
when they do; it costs more and covers less. Inability to get liability
insurance will simply put many family companies and other operators out of
business. And with them, thousands of good paying jobs with benefits that are
highly coveted in the rural areas of the state. Indeed, the cost of the current
regulatory structure and cost of liability insurance has made California lumber
less competitive. Today, up to seventy percent of lumber consumed in this state
is imported from the Pacific North West, Canada and other areas. California is
exporting thousands of good paying jobs to other areas as our friends and
families in the industry suffer and lose their livelihoods.
Some opponents to this reform package expressed concerns
over limiting fire liability to a more reasonable approach like all the other
states have. Others made a major issue out of the one percent timber fee to pay
for forestry regulation. The fact is,
this new funding source will provide a stable stream of revenue to pay for THP
review, allow the state to eliminate highly regressive regulatory fees now
being paid, and will level the playing field so that all producers of lumber
selling into California have skin in the game. For smaller timber producers in
rural California, it gives them a better opportunity to compete with large out-of-state
producers and to create good jobs in Northern California. Many politicians and
policy makers constantly repeat that they want to help the state’s economy and
create jobs. Well this THP reform legislative package is ground zero in job
creating and economic development. With it, we can expand California’s share of
timber production and consumption in the state and create thousands of new
jobs. Without it, more producers would have been forced out of the business causing
California to import thousands more truckloads of lumber from out of state and
send our coveted jobs across the state’s border.
Well-written, Tom. Two problems, though. First, defining "lumber products" going forward will likely be confusing (we're already getting calls at Mr. Runner's BOE office). Retailers, contractors and others are not sure which products are subject to the 1% tax. Second, the bill give assigns the Department of Forestry the job of writing any clarifying rules/regulations regarding this new tax on consumers. Since BOE is responsible to audit all the retailers, BOE should have been given the job of writing the regulations its auditors will have to work under. Just my two cents.
ReplyDelete